Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76680 (PNJ)

RAVINDER SINGH CHEEMA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/19109/2025 · 2025-07-11

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-19109-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 126 CWP-19109-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Ravinder Singh Cheema and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Kuljit Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** SUDHIR SINGH , J. (oral) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners have sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to take steps for removal of illegal encroachment on auction platform No.3 in the New Mandi, Sunam. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already made a representation dated 10.03.2025 (Annexures P-21) to respondent No.4- Deputy Commissioner, Sangrur, for redressal of their grievances, but no action has been taken thereon till date. He further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, if the respondent authorities are directed to deal with their concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said representation. SATYAWAN 2025.07.16 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-19109-2025 (O&M) 2 3. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Kuljit Singh, learned Addl. A.G., Punjab, appears on behalf of respondents and submits that the said representation/application hall be considered and decided in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4- Deputy Commissioner, Sangrur to look into the representation dated 10.03.2025 (Annexures P-21) and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE 11.07.2025 (ALOK JAIN) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No SATYAWAN 2025.07.16 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document