MASLYODDIN MASUM SHAIKH MASUM SHAIKH AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP/1661/2025 · 2025-02-05
Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7668 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7668 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1661.25wp (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
932 WRIT PETITION NO. 1661 OF 2025
1. Maslyoddin masum Shaikh s/o Masum Shaikh
2. Suleman Usman Pathan VERSUS
1. The State of Maharashtra, thr. its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Mumbai
2. The Commissioner of Education, Pune
3. The Director of Education (Secondary and Higher Secondary), Pune
4. The Divisional Deputy Director of Education Chh. Sambhajinagar
5. The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Chh. Sambhajinagar
6. Superintendent of Pay Unit (Secondary), Z.P., Chh. Sambhajinagar
7. Modern Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Georai, Dist. Beed
8. The Head Master, Urdu High School, Hattisinghpura, Chh. Sambhajinagar …. Mr V. G. Salgare, Advocate for petitioners Mr A. V. Lavte, A.G.P. for respondents/State CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND
PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.
DATE : 5th February, 2025 PER COURT:
1. Though the prayers are different, the learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if direction is given to respondent No.5/Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar for considering the 2025:BHC-AUG:3360-DB
1661.25wp (2) petitioners’ representation / request vide communication dated 06/12/2024 and the subsequent communications.
2. The writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.5 to consider petitioners’ representation mentioned herein above and take appropriate decision in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of five weeks.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) sjk