Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76669 (KAR)

DISCOVERY VENTURES LLP v. MR NAZEER

WP/31778/2024 · 2025-08-28

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33615 WP No. 31778 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 31778 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: DISCOVERY VENTURES LLP REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM UNDER PARTNERSHIP ACT 2008 OFFICE AT NO.110/8, KRISHNNAPPA LAYOUT, LALBAGH ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 027 REP. BY AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAMODA GOWDA T.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. NAZEER S/O.LATE MR. SYED SAB, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. MR. MOULA S/O.LATE MR. SYED SAB AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 3. MR. BABA JAN S/O.LATE MR. SYED SAB AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 4. MR. SADIQ S/O.LATE MR. SYED SAB, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33615 WP No. 31778 of 2024 5. MRS. ZEENATH D/O.LATE MR. SYED SAB W/O.MR. MAHABOOB, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 6. MRS. ZAREENA D/O.LATE MR. SYED SAB, W/O. MR. KHALLEL, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 6 ARE R/AT. SULTHANAPETE VILLAGE, NANDI LOBELIA, CHICKBALLAPUR TALUK – 562 101 7. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEY SETTLEMENT, CHICKABALLAPUR TALUK, CHICKABALLAPUR – 562 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VISHWANATH R. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.02.2024, IN FDP NO.28/2020, PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHICKBALLAPUR, ANNEXURE-F AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33615 WP No. 31778 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has moved a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The Petitioner respectfully submits that, the Petitioner and the Respondents have amicably settled the above matter, outside of the court hence, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the above petition as ‘not pressed’, in the interest of justice.” In terms of the memo, the writ petition is disposed as withdrawn. In view of the disposal of the main petition, all pending memo / interlocutory application, stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5