Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76663 (BOM)

Gauri Mahesh Nalawade v. Sanjeev Kumar

CP/723/2025 · 2025-12-04

Aarti A Sathe, Shri G S Kulkarni

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

3 CP 723-25.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 723 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13614 OF 2018 Gauri Mahesh Nalawade ...Petitioner Versus Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. ...Respondents _______ Mr. Vaishali Jagdale for Petitioner. Mr. Abhijeet Joshi for Respondent No.1 to 3. _______ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ. DATE: 4thDECEMBER 2025 P.C. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties in the present proceedings, which were earlier adjourned as the order dated 25th July 2025 passed by the First Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 13614 of 2018 had been challenged by the Respondents before the Supreme Court. 2. We are informed by Mr. Joshi, learned counsel for the Respondents, that the Supreme Court, by its order dated 28th November 2025, has dismissed the Special Leave Petition bearing Appeal (C) No. 34042 of 2025. In view of the above, Mr. Joshi has stated that the appointment order will be issued to the Petitioner. 3. We accordingly direct that the orders passed by this Court be complied with without further delay and, in any event, within a period of two weeks from today. Laxmi LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Digitally signed by LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2025.12.05 12:04:29 +0530 3 CP 723-25.DOC 4. For these reasons, we do not propose to proceed further with the present contempt petition. However, in the event of any further non-compliance, the Petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the petition. 5. The Contempt Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs. (AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Laxmi