Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76653 (PAT)

Ankit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/16071/2024 · 2025-01-16

Rajesh Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16071 of 2024 ====================================================== Ankit Kumar S/o Birendra Singh @ Birendra Kumar, resident of village- Surheri, P.S.- Muffasil, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar Patna. 2. The Commissioner, Mines and Geology, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Gaya. 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police Gaya. 5. The District Mines Officer, Gaya. 6. The S.H.O. Muffasil Police Station, Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Government Pleader 19 For the Mines : Mr. Naresh Diskhit, Spl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 16-01-2025 Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State as well as Mr. Naresh Diskhit, learned Spl. P.P. appearing on behalf of the Mines Department. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has deposited the fine for the vehicle in question to the tune of Rs.35,650/- (rupees thirty five thousand six hundred fifty) in the office of the District Mines Officer, Gaya and despite of that the vehicle in question has not been released as yet in favour of the petitioner. Patna High Court CWJC No.16071 of 2024(2) dt.16-01-2025 2/2 3. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the State as well as learned Spl. P.P. for the Mines Department are directed to release the vehicle in question in favour of the petitioner after verifying from the District Transport Office within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt/production of the copy of this order. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. ajay/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U