Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7665 (KAR)

SIDDIQUE FAIYAZ HASSAN S/O ABDUL RASHEED SIDDIQUE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CCC/100329/2024 · 2025-01-20

B M Shyam Prasad, Ramachandra D Huddar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:846-DB CCC No. 100329 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100329 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SIDDIQUE FAIYAZ HASSAN S/O. ABDUL RASHEED SIDDIQUE, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE WORK, R/O. H. NO.2, KHALIFA STREET, BHATKAL-531320, TQ. BHATKAL, DIST. UTTARKANNADA. 2. FATIMA TAZEEN W/O. MOHAMMED ASHFAQUE, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. NATIONAL ROAD, MAGDOOM COLONY, BHATKAL-531320, REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER DILDAR MUBEEN S/O. MOHAMMED MIRAN KANDLOOR, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE WORK, R/O. BUNDER ROAD, MAGDOOM COLONY, BHATKAL, TQ. BHATKAL, DIST. UTTARKANNADA. 3. MOHINUDDIN S/O. MOHAMMED MEERAN KANDLOOR @ MOHINUDDIN KANDLOOR S/O. KANDLOOR MOHD. MEERAN, AGE 49 YEARS, R/O. H. NO.51, BUNDER ROAD, BHATKAL-581320, REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER, DILDAR MUBEEN S/O. MOHAMMED MIRAN KANDLOOR, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE WORK, R/O. BUNDER ROAD, MAGDOOM COLONY, BHATKAL, TQ. BHATKAL, DIST. UTTARKANNADA. 4. BIBI TAHIRA W/O. MOHAMMED MIRAN KANDLOOR, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:846-DB CCC No. 100329 of 2024 R/O. BUNDER ROAD, MAGDOOM COLONY, BHATKAL-531320. REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER DILDAR MUBEEN S/O. MOHAMMED MIRAN KANDLOOR, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE WORK, R/O. BUNDER ROAD, MAGDOOM COLONY BHATKAL, TQ. BHATKAL, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA. 5. DILDAR MUBEEN S/O. MOHAMMED MIRAN KANDLOOR, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BUNDER ROAD, MAGDOOM COLONY, BHATKAL, TQ. BHATKAL, DIST. UTTARKANNADA. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. D. J. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDAHAN SOUDHA BENGALURU-01. 2. TAHASILDAR, BHATKAL-581320, TQ. BHATKAL, DIST. UTTARKANNADA. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY AGA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD. …ACCUSED THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED U/S. 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO INITIATE THE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST A-2 ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCES COMMITTED BY THEM FOR THE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 10-06-2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE, HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH AT DHARWAD IN W.P. NO. 103135/2023 (KLR-RES). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS PASSED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:846-DB CCC No. 100329 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD) On perusal of memo for withdrawal dated 07.01.2025, the complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (B.M.SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE RSH/ct-an List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22