501-WP-11679-2025.DOC Satish Sangar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.11679 OF 2025 Akshay Prakash Wagh and Ors. …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra Through its Additional Chief Secretary, Water Resource Department and Ors. …Respondents Mr.Yashodeep Deshmukh a/w Mr.Pratham Gawali i/b. Ms.Vaidehi Pradeep, for the Petitioners. Mr.A.A.Alaspurkar, AGP a/w Mr.V.G.Badgujar, AGP, for Respondent No.1 – State. Mr.Abhijeet A. Joshi (Through V.C.), for Respondent No.2. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATED: 4th DECEMBER 2025. PC:- 1. Mr.Yashodeep Deshmukh, learned counsel appearing for the Petitionners submits that the judgment and order dated 10th July 2025 passed by the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (“MAT”) Aurangabad Bench, impugned in the present Writ Petition, was also assailed by similarly situated aggrieved persons in Writ Petition No.10268 of 2025 which Petition has been allowed by the Division Bench at Aurangabad vide judgment dated 2nd December 2025. He submits that since the impugned judgment of the MAT has been set aside, hence, the Writ Petition has worked out. Therefore, in the light of the judgment dated 2nd December 2025, the present Writ Petition can be disposed of. 4th December 2025 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2025.12.05 10:42:08 +0530 501-WP-11679-2025.DOC 2. Mr.A.A.Alaspurkar, learned AGP appearing for Respondent No.1 and Mr.Abhijeet Joshi, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 – Caveator have also confirmed the said position. If that be so, nothing further survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition. 3. The present Writ Petition, therefore, stands allowed in the light of the decision of the Aurangabad Bench of this High Court rendered in Prashant Babulal Gaikwad and Others V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others (Writ Petition No.10268 of 2025) rendered on 2nd December 2025. 4. The Writ Petition stands closed. (S. M. MODAK, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) 4th December 2025