Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76638 (ALL)

RANJEET CHAMAR @ RANJEET GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/2371/2025 · 2025-07-23

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121426 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2371 of 2025 Applicant :- Ranjeet Chamar @ Ranjeet Gautam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No.43 of 2019, arising out of case crime no.146 of 2019 (SST No. 11/2020), under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) and 3(2)va) of the SC/ST act, Police Station Sikrara, District Jaunpur, pending in the Court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Jaunpur expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in the said case and same is pending since long. It is further submitted that only three prosecution witnesses have been examined and the case is pending at the stage of recording of evidence of remaining witnesses. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that the said case is pending at the stage of recording of the evidence of witnesses. Hence, the trial court is directed to make all possible efforts to dispose of the case under reference as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year and six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 24.7.2025 safi Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad