COCP-3273 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 220 Dinesh Yadav Pardeep Dahiya CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 12.05.2025 (Annexure P Court in C and others’ 2. of affidavit of Sh. Pradeep Dahiya, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Gurugram, is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. dated 12.09.2025 (Annexure R order dated 3273-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: 1 Dinesh Yadav Versus Pardeep Dahiya CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Saurav Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 12.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a Division Bench of Court in CWP-13469-2025 titled as ‘Dinesh Yadav ’, whereby it was directed as under: “4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 4 (competent authority), to look into the complaint/ representation dated 11.03.2025 (Annexure P petitioner and take an appropriate action thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six w from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. Compliance report dated 13.09.2025 of affidavit of Sh. Pradeep Dahiya, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Gurugram, is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent 12.09.2025 (Annexure R-1) to submit that in compliance of the order dated 12.05.2025 (Annexure P-1), speaking order IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3273-2025 Date of Decision: 15.09.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Saurav Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 1) passed by a Division Bench of this Dinesh Yadav vs. State of Haryana whereby it was directed as under:- Without commenting on merits of the case, the present of with a direction to respondent No. 4 , to look into the complaint/ 11.03.2025 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner and take an appropriate action thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order.” 13.09.2025, filed in Court by way of affidavit of Sh. Pradeep Dahiya, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Gurugram, is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. earned counsel for the respondent refers to speaking order 1) to submit that in compliance of the 1), speaking order (Annexure R-1) The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order his State of Haryana Without commenting on merits of the case, the present of with a direction to respondent No. 4 of the petitioner and take an appropriate action thereon, in eeks , filed in Court by way of affidavit of Sh. Pradeep Dahiya, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Gurugram, is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been refers to speaking order 1) to submit that in compliance of the 1) RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.16 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3273 has been duly passed in the matter, therefore, present petition. 4. above, the order dated with and nothing survives in the disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 5. 6. required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby having been rendered 7. 8. 15.09.2025 rishu 3273-2025 -2- n duly passed in the matter, therefore, present petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the above, the order dated 12.05.2025 (Annexure P with and nothing survives in the present petition; and the same may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Heard. In view of the facts noted above, no further direct required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby having been rendered infructuous. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable n duly passed in the matter, therefore, nothing survives in the Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the 12.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) stands duly complied present petition; and the same may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby disposed of, as Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No nothing survives in the 1) stands duly complied present petition; and the same may be is as RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.16 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.