CRWP-72 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 115 Sajida and another State of Haryana and Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 10, who are harassing in order to save their prestige in the society. 2. petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 is unmarried and petitioner no.2 is married. It is relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 10. The petitioners have submitted a representation dat respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and liberty. 3. 4. the respondent 7293-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH another Versus State of Haryana and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Abhishek Pundir, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 10, who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 is unmarried and petitioner no.2 is married. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 10. The petitioners have submitted a representation dat respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and liberty. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7293-2025 Decided on:09.07.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Advocate, The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 is unmarried and petitioner no.2 is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 10. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and liberty. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 is unmarried and petitioner no.2 is -in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 10. The 3) to Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.09 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-72 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2 decide the representation (Annexure P protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live July 09, 2025 vinod* 7293-2025 Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Superintendent of Police, District Palwal, to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live-in relationship. July 09, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - ithout entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Superintendent of Police, District Palwal, to 3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever in relationship. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES ithout entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Superintendent of Police, District Palwal, to the petitioners and grant them It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.09 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document