SRI RAGHAVENDRA @ YATHISH v. SMT.ANNAPURNA @ CHANDRIKA
RPFC/8/2022 · 2025-07-21
Lalitha Kanneganti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76622 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76622 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST OF JULY 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
RPFC NO. 8 OF 2022
BETWEEN
SRI RAGHAVENDRA @ YATHISH, S/O LATE P. BASAVARAJ, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: CAR DRIVER, R/O C/O VIJAYALAKSHMI,
“MANJULA NILAYA”, 8TH CROSS, NANJANAGUD, DISTRICT – MYSURU – 571 301.
...PETITIONER/S
(By SRI/SMT.: MANJULA DEVI R. KAMADALLI, ADVOCATE) AND
SMT. ANNAPURNA @ CHANDRIKA, W/O RAGHAVENDRA @ YATHISH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O NO. 255, 1ST CROSS, GURUPURA, SHIVAMOGGA – 577 201.
...RESPONDENT/S
RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.10.2021 PASSED IN …2
RPFC NO. 8 of 2022
2
CRI.MISC.NO.15/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, SHIVAMOGGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE.
This RPFC coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order.
ORAL ORDER A week’s time is granted to do the needful.
By that time, if the needful is not done, the petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Delete from the caption for ‘dismissal’.
Sd/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 21.07.2025, office objections are not complied with. Hence, the petition is hereby dismissed.
COPY
Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : VS C By : GS
Ty.Dt. : 30.01.2026 C.Dt : 11.02.2026