1 2025:CGHC:6567 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1004 of 2025 Mathura Prasad Sahu S/o Late Shri Manohar Lal Sahu Aged About 37 Years Occupation - Work Charged Helper, EE (E and M) Division P.H.E., Department Rajnandgaon, Dist. Rajnandgaon (C.G.). ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Public Health Engineering Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Tahsil District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Superintendent Engineer (E and M), Division, Public Health Engineering, Near Bhawan, Civil Lines Raipur, Dist. - Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Executive Engineer (E and M) Division, P.H.E. Department Rajnandgaon, Dist. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.). ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Anubhav Vatsa, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 05.02.2025 1 Heard Mr. Anubhav Vatsa, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.02.06 10:42:22 +0530 2 2 The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent no.2 to deciding the pending application dated 26/12/2024 of the petitioner for promotion on the post of Regular Assistant Ring Operator (Annexure P/1). 10.2 that, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the present facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted.” 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is having the limited prayer to consider his pending representation for grant of promotion to the post of Regular Assistant Ring Operator. He has further submits that he has already filed a representation before the concerned respondent authorities on 26.12.2024, which has not been considered and decided till date. 4 At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to file fresh representation before the concerned respondent authorities and prayed that a direction may be given to the concerned respondent authorities to consider and decide the same within considerable time frame. 5 Be that as it may, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the concerned respondent authority within a period of 10 days ventilating his grievance along with the 3 documents annexed with this petition and the concerned respondent authorities are directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in a pragmatic manner within a period of 45 days from the date of filing of representation of the petitioner. 6 With the aforementioned observation/direction, instant writ petition is disposed of. - Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh