SIMMI TANGRI v. HARYANA SHEHARY VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS Vs HARYANA SHEHARY VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS
RA-CW/340/2025 · 2026-04-18
Deepak Manchanda, Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 766 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 766 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RA-CW-340-2025 IN CWP-14487-2025
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
204
RA-CW-340-2025 IN CWP-14487-2025
Date of Decision: 18.04.2026
SIMMI TANGRI
.....Applicant Versus HARYANA SHEHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS
........Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA
Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Gaurav Bakshi, Advocate,
for the applicant-petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Sabherwal, Advocate,
for the respondents. ****
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral)
1.
The present review application has been filed on the ground that while dismissing the writ petition on 22.07.2025, the co-ordinate Bench had recorded a particular fact that not only the allotment of the plot in favour of the review-petitioner was cancelled but the same was re-auctioned in June, 2023 and the letter of intent had already been issued to the successful bidder, who was allotted the said plot thereafter and the amount has already been deposited by such auction purchaser, whereas, the auction conducted on 21.06.2023 has not been finalized.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents concede the said fact.
3.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record with their able assistance.
4.
Once, an incorrect fact has led to passing of an order sought to SANDEEP KUMAR 2026.04.18 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
RA-CW-340-2025 IN CWP-14487-2025
2
be reviewed and the order so passed relies upon such incorrect fact to reach the conclusion, the same gives rise to the review of such order.
5.
Keeping in view the said conceded fact that the order dated 22.07.2025 is passed on relying upon an incorrect fact, the present review application is allowed. Order dated 22.07.2025 is recalled and the writ petition is restored to its original number. Main Petition
To be listed as per roster.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
JUDGE
(DEEPAK MANCHANDA) 18.04.2026
JUDGE sandeep
Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes
Whether Reportable :
No SANDEEP KUMAR 2026.04.18 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.