[2025:RJ-JP:9471] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 247/2025 Rajesh Kumar Saini S/o Gyarsi Lal Saini, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Dhani Batiyawali Post- Gadrata, Tehsil Khetri, District- Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Superintendent Of Police Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Babai, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 5. Hawa Singh S/o Shri Inder Raj, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Buchiyala Tan- Pratappura Post- Babai, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Fateh Chand Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 04/03/2025 1. This criminal writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking protection against the threats from the private respondent No.5 as he further submits that he has already made a complaint but no action is being taken by the Police Officer. [2025:RJ-JP:9471] (2 of 2) [CRLW-247/2025] 2. This Court vide order dated 21.02.2025 directed the learned Public Prosecutor to call for the factual report as regards the averments made by the petitioner in this criminal writ petition. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that after examining the complaint submitted by the petitioner, the police has already filed a complaint under Sections 126 and 135 of BNSS 2023 so as to bind out the culprits to maintain law and order. 4. In view of the facts stated by the learned Public Prosecutor, the complaint has already been submitted by the police under Sections 126 and 135 of BNSS 2023, no further directions are required to be issued at this stage. 5. Accordingly, this criminal writ petition is disposed of. 6. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail the remedy as is available to him under law, in case he is aggrieved by any future action of the respondents. 7. In view of the order passed in the main petition, the stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Pcg/415