IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3252 of 2025 ====================================================== Pushpa Mishra @ Pushpa Kumari Wife of Aakash Kumar Mishra, Resident of Village- Ghoghardiha, P.S.- Ghoghardiha, District - Madhubani and presently residing as D/o- Bindeshwar Jha, resident of Village- Vidhyapati Nagar Chakdah, P.S. - Rajnagar, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus Aakash Kumar Mishra Son of Hemchandra Mishra, Resident of Village - Ghoghardiha, P.S.- Ghoghardiha, District- Madhubani and presently resident at Lord Krishana West Dighi Tank, P.O. - Lalbagh, P.S. - Sadar Darbhanga, District - Darbhanga, Pin Code - 846004. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 17-08-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): "for transfer of Matrimonial Case No.264 of 2024 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Darbhanga to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Madhubani.” 3. The opposite party on the other hand submits that he has no objection to the relief sought for by the petitioner but he be allowed to appear through the video conferencing. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection Patna High Court MJC No.3252 of 2025(2) dt.17-08-2026 2/2 to the opposite party appear through the video conferencing. 5. Having heard with the consent of both parties, Matrimonial Case No. 264 of 2024 is hereby transferred from the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Darbhanga to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Madhubani with liberty to both parties to appear either physically or virtually through video conferencing. 5. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Madhubani considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation. 6. The MJC No. 3252 of 2025 stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U