Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7656 (RAJ)

SONU S/O SHRI RAM SWAROOP v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2545/2025 · 2025-02-24

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8332] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.2545/2025 Sonu S/o Shri Ram Swaroop, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Deoli, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Dist. Jail Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kabra, Adv. Mr. Kunal Agarwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 24/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.90/2024 registered at Police Station SOP, District Tonk, for the offence(s) under Sections 110, 304(2) and 3(5) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated for the offences under Sections 3(5), 110, 304(2), 140(2), 309(6), 115(2) and 103(1) of BNS. He further submits that the incident occurred on 06.07.2024 and the deceased in his Parcha Bayan has stated that the accused hit him on his abdomen. The deceased died on 21.10.2024 and in between the deceased remained admitted for several times in the hospital. It is clearly stated in the post- mortem report that the deceased remained admitted in the [2025:RJ-JP:8332] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2545/2025] hospital from 08.07.2024 to 19.07.2024, 25.07.2024 to 12.08.2024, 23.08.2024 to 01.10.2024 and lastly from 07.10.2024 to 21.10.2024. It is also contended that the injuries caused to the deceased was not with the intention to kill and there was no murderous intention on the part of the accused-petitioner. It it also contended that the offence under Section 103(1) is not made out against the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 02.10.2024 and trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. The charge-sheet has already been produced against the accused-petitioner before the concerned Court. It is alleged against the accused-petitioner that he hit the deceased on his abdomen. The deceased remained hospitalized for different time period, the post mortem report of the deceased shows that due to perforation in the peritoneum cavity the deceased died. However, the medical opinion was kept reserved in want of histopathology report, and the final opinion has not been given, be that as it may, the allegation against the accused-petitioner is only of hitting the deceased at his abdomen, therefore, considering the above facts, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Sonu S/o Shri Ram Swaroop, in connection with FIR No.90/2024 [2025:RJ-JP:8332] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2545/2025] registered at Police Station SOP, District Tonk, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-76