Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7656 (PNJ)

UNION OF INDIA v. CT EDUCATION SOCIETY AND OTHERS

LPA/2587/2025 · 2026-07-10

Alka Sarin, Amarjot Bhatti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

203-6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-2587-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.07.2026 UNION OF INDIA …. Appellant VERSUS CT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY AND ORS …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present : Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Additional Solicitor General of India with Ms. Gurmeet Kaur Gill, Senior Panel Counsel for the appellant. Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. AG Punjab and Ms. Mandeep Kaur, DAG Punjab for respondent Nos.2 to 4. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1. The present Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) has been filed challenging the order 31.01.2025 passed by the learned Single Bench in CWP- 2631-2025 whereby the writ petition was disposed off in terms of the order dated 09.01.2025 passed in CWP-13761-2024 titled as ‘Akashdeep & Ors. Versus State of Punjab & Ors.’. 2. The only grievance raised by the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant is that in para No.22 of the order dated 09.01.2025 passed by the learned Single Bench in CWP-13761-2024, it has been stated that in case any of the Institution(s) had not raised any claim before the Union of India or the State of Punjab, they would be at liberty to give their AMAN JAIN 2026.07.14 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment LPA-2587-2025 (O&M) -2- details of entitlement by filing an appropriate representation along with the necessary documents with the respective departments of the Government of Punjab as well as before the appropriate department of Government of India. 3. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has contended that the disbursement is to be made by the Government of Punjab and as such the representation(s), if any, filed by the Institution(s) would have to be forwarded to the Government of Punjab. 4. In view of the above limited prayer made by the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, it is clarified that the representation, if any, as received by the appellant in terms of para No.22 of the order dated 09.01.2025 passed by the learned Single Bench in CWP- 13761-2024, would be forwarded to the Government of Punjab for further action. 5. The appeal stands disposed off in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. (ALKA SARIN) JUDGE (AMARJOT BHATTI) 10.07.2026 JUDGE Aman Jain NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2026.07.14 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment