Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76556 (MAD)

Dhanam v. Deputy Superintendent of Police

CRL OP/19823/2025 · 2025-07-31

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.19823 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 31.07.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.19823 of 2025 1.Dhanam 2.Ramachandran ... Petitioners Vs. 1.Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch (2), Tirupattur District. 2. The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch (2), Tirupattur District. (Crime No.Not Known of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No. Not Known of 2025 on the file of respondent Police. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Ramesh For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Criminal Side) O R D E R 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19823 of 2025 The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 336(3) of BNS Act, in Crime No. Not known of 2025, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that Current Paper enquiry is pending against the petitioners in C.P.No.9916 of 2025. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), it is hereby directed that the respondent police has to issue notice under Section 35 of BNSS (41A of Cr.P.C) to the petitioners and the petitioners are directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioners, register the F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within a period of three weeks from today. 4. The parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry. It is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the petitioners till the completion of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the de facto complainant. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19823 of 2025 5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 31.07.2025 drl To 1. The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Tirupattur. 2. Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch (2), Tirupattur District. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch (2), Tirupattur District. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19823 of 2025 drl Crl.O.P.No.19823 of 2025 31.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis