Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7653 (UTT)

DR ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/742/2023 · 2025-07-10

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.742 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Devesh Kaushik, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner-Ankit Arora on 20.12.2023. 4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that he would advise petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in the appropriate proceedings before this Court. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous. 6. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings in this Court, if so advised. 7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 10.07.2025 Ravi