THIRURANGADI SAMYUKTHA SUNNI MAHAL JUMA-ATH SAMRAKSHANA SAMITHI v. THE STATE OF KERALA
WP(C)/22485/2019 · 2025-04-02
Mohammed Nias C P
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7652 (KER) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7652 (KER) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP(C) NO. 22485 OF 2019 1 2025:KER:28097 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 22485 OF 2019 PETITIONER:
THIRURANGADI SAMYUKTHA SUNNI MAHAL JUMA-ATH SAMRAKSHANA SAMITHI MELECHINNA JUMA MASJID, THIRURANGADI P.O., MALAPPURAM, KERALA-676306, REP. BY ITS CONVENER, MANOOR AREEKATTU, AGED 43, S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN, MELEVEETIL HOUSE, T C ROAD, THIRURANGADI P.O., MALAPPURAM, KERALA-676306. BY ADV G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2 O.K.ABDULLAKUTTY MAKDOOMI, S/O.MOOSANKUTTY MUSALIAR, ODAKAL HOUSE, KUZHIPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM, KERALA-676306. BY ADV SMT.SURYA BINOY, SENIOR GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 22485 OF 2019 2 2025:KER:28097 MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J ............................................................ WP(C)No.22485 of 2019 ............................................................. Dated this the 02nd day of April, 2025 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P13 passed by the Government after considering a representation submitted by them, primarily alleging that the 2nd respondent was pretending to be a Kazi appointed under the provisions of the Kazi Act, 1880. The petitioner alleges that the 2nd respondent was never appointed as a Kazi and he has fabricated documents, including using the Government seal. Based on the above allegation, Ext.P13 mentions the registration of criminal cases under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the IPC against the 2nd respondent. As regards the other relief sought by the petitioner in Ext.P13 representation, the Government found that those are civil disputes to be sorted out elsewhere. Going through Ext.P13, it cannot be said that the stand of the Government is wrong. WP(C) NO. 22485 OF 2019 3 2025:KER:28097 Under such circumstances, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to institute appropriate proceedings to pursue the reliefs claimed in their representation, the writ petition is closed, keeping their contentions open. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE Anu
WP(C) NO. 22485 OF 2019 4 2025:KER:28097 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22485/2019 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DELIVERED IN WP(C) NO.38661 OF 2017 DATED 13.7.2018 BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE WRIT PETITION FILED AS WP(C) NO.38661 OF 17 DATED 28.11.17 BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT IN EXT.P2 DATED 5.12.17.
EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 4.2.2019. EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 21.2.2019. EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 26.3.2018. EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 21.6.18. EXHIBIT P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST MADE TO THE INFORMATION OFFICER DATED 11.8.18. EXHIBIT P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 29.8.18. EXHIBIT P10 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 6.3.2019. EXHIBIT P11 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 9.3.2019. EXHIBIT P12 A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED
9.3.2019. EXHIBIT P13 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 20.7.2019.