Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76517 (BOM)

KHAN ABDUL HAMID v. PANACHE BRAND SOLUTIONS AND ORS.

ALP/548/2018 · 2025-10-17

Gauri Godse

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24-ALP-548-2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 548 OF 2018 Mr. Khan Abdul Hamid … Applicant vs. Panache Brand Solutions and Others … Respondents Ms. Angana Sarmah i/b. Mr. Diwakar Singh for the Applicant. Mr. Prasanna P. Malshe, APP for the State. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATED : 17th OCTOBER 2025 ORDER: 1. Leave granted. 2. Appeal admitted. 3. Call for record and proceedings 4. For compliance under Section 390 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the trial court shall issue notice to respondent no. 2 – Mr. Ajit Verma, calling upon him to appear before the trial court on a particular date. 5. Accordingly, respondent no. 2 (accused) shall appear before the trial court on the given date and the trial court shall 1/2 rrpillai RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2025.10.18 02:28:46 +0200 24-ALP-548-2018.doc enlarge him on bail on the same day on appropriate terms and conditions. One of the conditions shall be for securing the presence of the accused before this court as and when called. 6. In case respondent no. 2 (accused) fails to remain present before the trial court as directed by this order, the trial court shall submit a report to this court. 7. List the appeal on 12th January 2026 for recording compliance and further directions. (GAURI GODSE, J.) 2/2