IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CR-4122-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.07.2025 SURESH KUMAR …..PETITIONER Vs. VIKRAM …..RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Himanshu Joshi, Advocate for the peoner. ******* DEEPAK GUPTA, J. Peoner herein was the tenant before learned Rent Controller. Peon under Secon 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Evicon) Act, 1973 filed by the landlord-Vikram (respondent herein), seeking ejectment of tenant (i.e. peoner herein) from the demised shop was allowed on 07.12.2022. Dismissing the appeal of the tenant on 31.05.2025, learned Appellate Authority upheld the order of Rent Controller. 2. Although, learned counsel for the peoner herein i.e. tenant argued for some me assailing the concurrent orders of the Courts below direcng his ejectment, but when this court was not impressed with the contenons raised by him, then he made a request to grant reasonable me of six months to the peoner-tenant to vacate the premises. 3. Submissions considered. While allowing the ejectment on 07.12.2022, the Rent Controller had granted one month me to the tenant to vacate the premises. Instead of complying the order, he filed appeal, which was ulmately dismissed by the Appellate Authority on 31.05.2025. 4. As per peoner, he is in possession of the demised shop ever since 2003 and requires reasonable me to look for alternave premises. PRIYANKA 2025.07.14 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-4122-2025 (O&M) 5. Considering all the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present peon is hereby disposed of with the direcon to the peoner to vacate the demised premises on or before 31.10.2025 posively. However, this order is subject to the condion that peoner-tenant shall clear all the arrears of rent on or before 31.07.2025. Secondly, he shall connue to pay the further rent ll 31.10.2025 by 7th day of every month. Thirdly, in case peoner fails to vacate the demised premises on or before 31.10.2025, he shall be liable to pay user charges/mesne profit at the rate of ₹50,000/- per month with effect from 01.11.2025 onwards, ll he actually vacates the premises. 6. Since the present order has been passed without issuing any noce of moon to the landlord i.e. respondent herein, he will be at liberty to approach this Court, in case he feels aggrieved by this order. Disposed of. 10.07.2025 Pry (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes Whether reportable? No PRIYANKA 2025.07.14 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document