Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:118143 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23269 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Meena Kumari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhiraj Kumar,Shashi Ranjan Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus direct to issue and appropriate order of direction given to the Tehsildar, Tehsil Soraon District Prayagraj to within stipulated time of Case No. 665 of 2025, Computerized Case No. T 202502030300665 (Meena Kumari Vs. Amrit Lal) under section 34 of U. P. Revenue Code 2006 to this writ petition within stipulated time of the petitioner." 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that mutation application was moved in the year 2025 which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. This Court on 02.07.2025 had required Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General to get instructions from State Government as to why petitions in such a large number are being filed in this Court for expediting mutation proceedings. 4. Pursuant to query made by this Court, learned Additional Advocate General placed before the Court the circular issued by State Government on 09.07.2025 wherein a direction has been issued by State Government to all Collectors of the State requiring Tehsildars and Sub Divisional Officers of the Tehsil and Division to conclude the mutation proceedings within the time period prescribed under the Code. 5. This Court requires that each and every Tehsildar and Sub Divisional Officer of the State should immediately comply the directions issued by State Government and in case the mutation applications are kept pending and are not decided within the time frame as provided under the Circular dated 09.07.2025 or as provided under the Code, 2006 or directed by this Court, it would amount to civil contempt under Section 2(e) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Without any further direction, the officer will be held disobedient of the order of this Court and would be guilty of contempt. 6. In view of said fact, respondent no. 2 is hereby directed to conclude the proceedings of Mutation Case No. 665 of 2025, Computerized Case No. T 202502030300665 (Meena Kumari Vs. Amrit Lal) under section 34 of U. P. Revenue Code 2006 positively within a period of three months, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law, after hearing all the affected parties. 7. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Kushal Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad