Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76477 (PNJ)

SHEELA AND ORS v. MAHIPAL AND ORS

FAO/3467/2016 · 2025-01-15

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN T 237 Smt. Sheela Mahipal an CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU challenging Accident C under Sectio same has no the argume thereafter counsel app present. In t appellants n present appe January 15 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR FAO No.3467-201 Date of decision : Sheela and others Versus pal and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the appellants. I GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellants-claimants have nging the Award dated 12.2.2016 pa ent Claims Tribunal, Rohtak vide whi Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act ha The present appeal pertains to th has not been issued so far. The order sh rguments were not advanced and the on 04.04.2019 also the matter was a el appearing for the appellants. Even today the arguing couns . In these circumstances it would be sa lants nor learned counsel for the appellan nt appeal. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 5, 2025 Asija r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2016 sion :-15.01.2025 …..Appellants …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA have filed the present appeal 16 passed by the learned Motor e which their claim petition filed Act has been dismissed. s to the year 2016 and notice in the rder sheets show that on 21.12.2016 d the matter was adjourned; and was adjourned on request of proxy counsel for the appellants is not be safe to presume that neither the pellants are interested to pursue the tion. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.01.17 17.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document