Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76472 (KAR)

SRI. K M PRASANNA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/15680/2025 · 2025-08-30

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33923 WP No. 15680 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 15680 OF 2025 (LR) BETWEEN: SRI. K.M. PRASANNA KUMAR S/O. LATE K.C. MALLAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 153, 19TH MAIN, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 562 095. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SINDHUSHREE, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. JAYARAJ D.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 561 203. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33923 WP No. 15680 of 2025 3. THE TAHASILDAR HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 562 114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CONCERNED JURISDICTIONAL ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER - RESPONDENT NO.2 IN PROCEEDING BEARING NO LRFSR(H) 18/2016-17 ANNEXURE-A (SERIES)BT TEVE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OF ANY QUE APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDE DATED 29.02.2020 PASSED BY THE CONCERNED JURISDICTIONAL ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RESPONDENT NO. 2 IN PROCEDING BEARING NO. LRFSR(H) 18/2016-17 VIDE ANNEXURE-A1 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for all the respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33923 WP No. 15680 of 2025 2. This writ petition has been filed aggrieved by the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner in proceedings bearing No.L.R.F.:SR(H):18/2016-17 dated 29.02.2020 at Annexure-A1. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a case where the impugned order of forfeiture has been passed by the Assistant Commissioner without notice to the petitioner. It is further submitted that under similar circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7821/2021 has passed an order dated 16.08.2021 remanding the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing to the aggrieved person. 4. Learned High Court Government Pleader points out from the impugned order that notice was indeed issued to the petitioner and in spite of notice having been issued, the petitioner did not appear before the Assistant Commissioner. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33923 WP No. 15680 of 2025 5. Admittedly, as on the date of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, no proceedings were pending before any court/authority. 6. This Court had several occasions to consider such cases, where writ petitions are filed long after the provisions contained in Sections 79A, 79B and 79C were omitted from the statute book in terms of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Second Amendment) Act, 2020. It is the consistent opinion of this Court that if at any rate, the Assistant Commissioner, after forfeiting the land has not disposed of the same in accordance with law then the benefit of the saving clause contained in Section 12 of the Amending Act is required to be given to such petitioners. The Assistant Commissioner is therefore, required to ascertain, whether the declared excess lands or forfeited lands still remain with the State Government or has been granted to third parties. If the lands have been granted to third party, then sub-section(1) of Section 12 of the amending Act will apply to say that the proceedings have - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33923 WP No. 15680 of 2025 reached finality. Or otherwise, sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Amending Act will apply and all further proceedings shall be declared as abated by the Assistant Commissioner. 7. Having considered the submission of the learned Counsels and on perusing the judgment of the co-ordinate Bench in W.P.No.7821/2021, this Court finds that facts and circumstances in both these matters are quite similar and therefore, the benefit of the decision of the co- ordinate bench should also enure to the petitioner herein. 8. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to pass the following: ORDER i) The writ petition is disposed of. ii) The matter is remanded back to the respondent-Assistant Commissioner to consider the case of the petitioner including the consequences of the subsequent amendment brought to the provisions of - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33923 WP No. 15680 of 2025 Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act in Karnataka Amendment No.56 of 2020. iii) If revenue entries have been altered pursuant to the impugned order dated 29.02.2020, the same shall be restored in favour of the petitioner. iv) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent-Assistant Commissioner on 18.09.2025, without waiting for further notice from the Assistant Commissioner. Ordered accordingly. Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24