Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76466 (PNJ)

LALITA v. VINAY KUMAR

COCP/3222/2025 · 2025-07-23

Sudeepti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-3222-2025 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103 COCP-3222-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.07.2025 Lalita ...Petitioner Versus Vinay Kumar, Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission (HSSC), Panchkula (Haryana) ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (ORAL) CM-14107-CII-2025 1. This is an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC to implead Dr. Vivek Aggarwal, IRS, Director of Elementary Education, Haryana as a party in the main case and for filing the amended memo of parties. 2. Application allowed. Dr. Vivek Aggarwal, IRS, Director of Elementary Education, Haryana is ordered to be impleaded as respondent No.2 in the main case. 3. Amended memo of parties is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Main Case 1. Learned counsel for the respondent contends that order dated 13.11.2024 has been complied with and the petitioner has been issued appointment letter on 22.07.2025. This fact is not disputed by the learned Yogesh Mehta 2025.07.25 17:08 I agree to specified portions of this document COCP-3222-2025 (O&M) [2] counsel for the petitioner 2. In view of the above, the present contempt is purged and rule is discharged. 23.07.2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No Yogesh Mehta 2025.07.25 17:08 I agree to specified portions of this document