Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:135385 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24865 of 2025 Applicant :- Sikandar Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ankit Kapoor Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Ankit Kapoor, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Birendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. 3. Sri Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam, learned counsel for the first informant is not present even in the revised list. Previously on 21.7.2025 also learned counsel for the first informant was not present even in the revised list but in the interest of justice as a last opportunity the matter was adjourned and it was made clear that the matter will not be adjourned on the next date.Office has placed on record vakalatnama of learned counsel for the first informant through its report dated 26.7.2025. The said order reads as under:- "1. List revised. 2. Sri Ankit Kapoor, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for State are present. Sri Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam, learned counsel for the first informant is not present even when the matter is taken in the revised list. 3. The Vakalatnama of Sri Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam, learned counsel for the first informant is not on record. Office to trace out the same and place it on record by the next date. 4. Since there is no representation from the side of the first informant, in the interest of justice as a last opportunity, the matter is adjourned for today. 5. Let the matter be listed on 11.08.2025 as fresh. 6. It is made clear that the matter will not be adjourned on the next date as a matter of right." 4. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant Sikandar Ali, seeking release on bail in connection with Case Crime No. 9 of 2025, under Sections 69, 74, 89, 127, 351(2) BNS, registered at P.S. Mahila Thana, District Varanasi. 5. Learned counsel for State points that as per his instructions the applicant is reported to be involved in one other case which has not been disclosed and explained and as such recital made in para-20 of the affidavit is false and incorrect. He submits that the bail application be dismissed in view of the order/judgement of the Apex Court passed in the cases of Munnesh Vs. State of U.P.: SLP (Crl.) No. 1400 / 2025 and Kaushal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan : 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1473. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant prays that since the criminal history of the applicant has not been disclosed and explained of the other cases, the present bail application under Section 483 BNSS be dismissed as withdrawn as he intends to file a better application with full and complete documents. 7. Prayer as prayed is allowed. 8. The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Samit Gopal,J.) Order Date :- 11.8.2025 Naresh Digitally signed by :- NARESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad