ROHIT KUMAR JAISWAL AND 7 OTHERS v. STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/10201/2025 · 2025-08-06
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76463 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76463 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133687 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10201 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rohit Kumar Jaiswal And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Chandra,Sanjay Kumar Nigam Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioners in Court today, is taken on record. Office is directed to register the same. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,
learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 & 4 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondents authorities to pay the salary to the petitioners for the post of Headmaster and to pay arrears since they are working as Incharge Headmaster within stipulated period.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners who are 8 in numbers have made representations before the respondents authorities for redressal of their grievances, but no decision has been taken till date. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondents authorities to take appropriate decision in the matter in accordance with law within a time bound period.
Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that the controversy regarding payment of the aforesaid has been settled by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.652 of 2024 (Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board and 2 Others vs. Tripurari Dubey and 3 Others) decided on 30.04.2025. However, he submits that in case a fresh representation is given by the petitioners individually before the respondent no.4, the same may be decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a fresh representation, individually, before the
respondent no.4- District Basic Education Officer, District- Siddharthnagar, raising all their grievances within a period of two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed, the respondent no.4 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, by reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order if there is no other legal impediment.
Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Rahul. Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad