Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25793 WP No. 20612 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20612 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
MRS. SHYNI THOMAS, W/O VINOD VARGHESE, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.SH3/970, DRDO COMPLEX, SIR C.V.RAMANAGRA, BENGALURU – 560 093. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.S.NAGARAJA., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, D.C. OFFICE, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU – 560 009.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT – 562 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER DATED 10.07.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND ETC.,
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25793 WP No. 20612 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner is not pressing the relief claimed in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
rs List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43