Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76459 (KAR)

DRAKSHAYINI v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER

MFA/7772/2023 · 2025-04-24

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI & SRI. RAVI. S. SAMPRATHI, MEMBER M.F.A.No.7772/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.1954/2025) BETWEEN: 1. DRAKSHAYINI, W/O LATE HARISHA A.C, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. 2. H. CHANDANGOWDA, S/O LATE HARISHA A.C, AGED ABOUT 08 YEARS. 3. ANANYA, D/O LATE HARISHA A.C, AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, 4. CHALUVEGOWDA, S/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 5. YASHODAMMA, W/O CHALUVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 2 ALL ARE APPELLANTS ARE R/AT: ANNIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. APPELLANTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE BEING MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER IS 1ST APPELLANT HEREIN. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. GIRISH B BALADARE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, K.S.R.T.C., HASSAN DIVISION, HASSAN - 573 201. 2. MANJUNATHA, S/O. LATE HUCHCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER, DEPOT, ARAKALAGUD. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT, NO.9, VIJAPAURA, 2ND COLONY VILLAGE, MALLIPATTANA HOBLI, ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D. VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE) THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 09.03.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO. 403/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT, ARAKALAGUD, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. 3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Corporation along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the Respondent - Corporation and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the Respondent - Corporation has agreed to pay a lump- sum of Rs. 12,00,000/- (Rupees Twelve Lakh Only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Corporation has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry 4 interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SHS