CHANDRAKALI v. RAVINDRA KUMAR MANDARDISTRICT MAGISTRATE
CAPL/3448/2025 · 2025-09-10
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3448 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned Standing Counsel for opposite party.
2. Pursuant to the previous orders of this Court, learned Standing Counsel has filed instruction dated 10.09.2025, which is taken on record. Based upon instruction, he submitted that order of Writ Court has been complied with and claim of applicant has been rejected vide order dated 02.07.2025, therefore, this application may be dismissed as infructuous, which is not objected by counsel for applicant.
3. Under such facts of the case no further order is required to be passed.
4. File is consigned to the record. September 11, 2025 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Praveen Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Chandrakali .....Applicant(s) Ravindra Kumar Mandardistrict Magistrate .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad