Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7645 (PNJ)

SURINDER KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CR/7735/2025 · 2026-07-13

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 131 CR-7735-2025 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 SURINDER KUMAR ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab Mr. B.S. Bath, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 08.09.2025 passed by Ld. Addl. District Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib whereby respondent has been permitted to tender fresh affidavit only with the correction in kharsra numbers from previous affidavit. 2. A dispute with respect to apportionment of compensation is pending before Ld. ADJ Fatehgarh Sahib. The respondent herein moved an application before Ld. ADJ seeking amendment of written statement. The said application was ordered to be deferred. The application was confined to correction in khasra numbers. He filed another application seeking permission to re-examine himself in evidence. Ld. ADJ by impugned order has allowed respondent to file fresh affidavit only with the correction in khasra numbers. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.07.13 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CR-7735-2025 -2- 3. On being asked, scope of interference in view of limited prayer and nature of impugned order, learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner may be granted liberty to raise all issues including limitation and the fact that fresh affidavit would be beyond pleadings before Reference Court. 4. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 does not dispute aforestated factual and legal position. 5. In the backdrop, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to petitioner to raise all issues including question of filing affidavit beyond pleadings before Reference Court. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE July 13, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.07.13 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment