Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Seema vs State of HP & Ors.
CMP No.4237 of 2025 In CWP No.2448 of 2025 [Disposed of matter]
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicant.
Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate
General, for respondents-State.
CMP No.4237 of 2025
Instant application has been filed by
Learned Counsel for Respondent N.3 [Municipal Council], for reflecting his name in the memo of parties, in the judgment dated 18.02.2025, passed in CWP No.2448 of 2025, for aforesaid respondent, which was inadvertently left out. Application is supported by an affidavit.
2.
In view of the averments made in the application, which is not opposed by
Learned Counsel(s) for non-applicants and the fact that the application is formal in nature, therefore, the instant application is allowed; and the name of Sh. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, Learned Counsel be treated as counsel for Respondent No.3 [Municipal Council], in the judgment dated 18.02.2025, passed in CWP No.2448 of 2025, titled as Seema Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, for all intents and purposes.
In aforesaid terms, the application stands
disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma) March 21, 2025
Judge
(Chiranjeev)