Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76447 (BOM)

SHASHIKALA ARUN GUNDA v. NANDKUMAR SHIVAJIRAO EKKE AND ANR

IA/3280/2021 · 2025-11-14

Shri Sandeep V Marne

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

k 1/2 902 ia 3280.21 in alpst as cri.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3280 OF 2021 IN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT.) (STAMP) NO.16492 OF 2021 Shashikala Arun Gunda ....Applicant V/S Nandkumar Shivajirao Ekke & Ors. ....Respondents WITH APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT.) (STAMP) NO.16492 OF 2021 Shashikala Arun Gunda ....Applicant V/S Nandkumar Shivajirao Ekke & Ors. ....Respondents _________ Ms. Suchita Chavan i/b Mr. Prabhakar M. Jadhav for the Applicant. Ms. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for Respondent No.2/State. __________ CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 14 NOVEMBER 2025. P.C.: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant/Appellant, on instructions, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Application and the Appeal with liberty to file Appeal under the Proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973/Section 413 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before the Sessions Court in view of judgment of the Apex Court in Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc.1. 1 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320 katkam Page No. 1 of 2 k 2/2 902 ia 3280.21 in alpst as cri.doc 2. Reserving the liberty as prayed for, the Application and Appeal are permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of. 3. If Appeal is filed before the Sessions Court within a period of eight weeks, the Appellant/Applicant shall be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) katkam Page No. 2 of 2 SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2025.11.15 11:52:16 +0530