PRIYANJU BHARTI @ TANI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/25420/2025 · 2025-08-10
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76440 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76440 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:135584 Court No. - 77 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 25420 of 2025 Applicant :- Priyanju Bharti @ Tani And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rama Pati Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA appearing for the State.
2. This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 19.06.2024 along with cognizance/summoning
order dated 09.10.2024 passed in the case arising out of Case Crime No.131 of 2023 (State Vs. Shival Bharti @ Ranu and others), under Sections 294, 323, 506 IPC and Section 66-E of I.T. Act, P.S. Gwaltoli, District Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of learned A.C.M.M.-7th, Kanpur Nagar.
3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as chargesheet and the statement recorded during investigation, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with chargesheet, can be set aside.
4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.
5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally
disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).
7. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case.
Order Date :- 11.8.2025 Vivek Kr. Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad