Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7644 (PAT)

Neha Kumari @ Neha Singh v. Praveen Kumar Singh @ Praveen Singh

MJC/3055/2025 · 2026-08-17

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3055 of 2025 ====================================================== Neha Kumari @ Neha Singh wife of Praveen Kumar Singh and daughter of Arun Kumar Singh, resident of village- Udwant Nagar, P.S.- Udwant Nagar, District- Bhojpur. Ara. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus Praveen Kumar Singh @ Praveen Singh son of Janardan Pratap Singh, resident of Village- Janakpuriya. P.S.- Chouri. District-Bhojpur, present address ward no. 7, Brahm Asthan. Veer Kunwar Singh Colony, Hajipur, P.O.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashutosh Krishna, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 17-08-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): "for transfer of Divorce Case No. 288 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hajipur to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ara.” 3. The opposite party on the other hand submits that he has no objection to the relief sought for by the petitioner but he be allowed to appear through the video conferencing. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the opposite party appear through the video conferencing. Patna High Court MJC No.3055 of 2025(4) dt.17-08-2026 2/2 5. Having heard with the consent of both parties, Divorce Case No. 288 of 2022 is hereby transferred from the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hajipur to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ara with liberty to both parties to appear either physically or virtually through video conferencing. 6. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ara considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation. 7. The MJC No. 3055 of 2025 stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U