Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34765 WP No. 22107 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 22107 OF 2025 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN:
SRI. B. GANGARAJU, S/O BASAVEGOUDA.
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O BHARATTURU VILLAGE.
K. HOSAKOTE HOBLI, ALURU TALUKU, HASANA DIST. – 573 120 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P. G. YATNAL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE – 560 001, REP/BY ITS SECRETARY
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 214
3.
THE TAHASILDAR SAKALESHAPUR. HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 214
4.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, FOR HEMAVATI RESERVOIR PROJECT, HASSAN – 573 214
5.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER.
HASSAN, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 214
Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34765 WP No. 22107 of 2025
6.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LANDS, SAKALESHAPURA, HASSAN DIST. – 573 201
7.
THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, HASSAN DIVISION, HASSAN – 573 201
8.
THE SP HASSAN, DCRB DIVISION, HASSAN, (C. E. N.CRIME POLICE, HASSAN) – 573 201 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER VIDE NO. L.N.D./HEJAYO (DA) 197/2015- 16 DATED 01.08.2022 PASSED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-E AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is aggrieved of the impugned order dated 01.08.2022 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Hemavathi Reservoir Project, Hassan, in case No.L.N.D/He.Ja.Yo(DA):197/2015-16 at Annexure-E.
2. The petitioner claims to a person who lost his lands due to submergence of his lands under water on the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34765 WP No. 22107 of 2025
construction of Hemavati/Yagachi/Vatehole Reservoir Project. In terms of the scheme proposed by the State Government, a person who lost land on account of submergence for the project, would not only be entitled for compensation but also entitled for grant of alternative lands to ensure that the livelihood of such agriculturists are not lost. Accordingly, 2.00 Acres of land in Block No.2 of Sy.No.413 of Yasaluru Village, Yesaluru Hobli, Sakaleshapura Taluk, was granted. However, several irregularities were found in the matter of allotment of alternative lands. Action was directed by the State Government having regard to such irregularities. The Special Land Acquisition Officer (for short ‘SLAO’) has passed the impugned
order in respect of the petitioner/grantee cancelling the grant.
3. Having regard to the ground on which the impugned order has been passed, it is clear that the SLAO has cancelled the grant on one of the following grounds :
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34765 WP No. 22107 of 2025
a) Grant was made to a person who had not lost any land in submergence; b) Bogus grant order has been created, although no such grant order was passed; c) Dual grant orders have been passed on the basis of one award passed by the SLAO; d) Such dual grant orders and fictitious grant orders have been passed during the tenure of Sri V.Srinivas Gowda or Sri B.A.Jagadeesh who were the then Special Land Acquisition Officers; e) Land granted is a forest land and not revenue lands and therefore it could not have been granted.
4. The factual information and the ground on which the impugned order of cancellation has been passed by the SLAO is identifiable as one of the grounds noticed hereinabove. Therefore, all other observations made in the impugned order are hereby set aside as not specifically
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34765 WP No. 22107 of 2025
applicable to the petitioner. It is also a fact that the impugned order of cancellation was passed without hearing the grantee and therefore, on the ground of denial of principles of natural justice alone, the impugned order of cancellation is required to be set aside.
5. Consequently, this Court proceeds to pass the following:
ORDER
i) Writ petition is allowed in part.
ii) The impugned order dated 01.08.2022 in case No.LND/He.Ja.Yo(DA):197/2015-16 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Hemavathi Reservoir Project, Hassan, at Annexure ‘E’, is hereby quashed and set aside. iii) The matter stands remanded back to the SLAO to reconsider the matter afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing to the grantee/petitioner.
The petitioner is permitted to submit any material to defend the order of grant.
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34765 WP No. 22107 of 2025
iv) Insofar as the cancellation orders passed on the ground that the land in question is a forest land and not revenue land and therefore, it could not have been granted, the SLAO is required to reconsider the matter after securing the opinion from the forest department as well as the Revenue department. If ultimately it is found that the land is a forest land, then alternative lands shall be granted to the petitioner. v) Consequent to the restoration of the grant in favour of the grantee/petitioner, the revenue entries shall also be restored in the RTC.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
DL