IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66491 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2025 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ranjeet Das Son of Rohini Das, Resident of Village-Raipur, Bujurg, P.S.- Sarairanjan, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surya Narayan Roy, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 17-09-2025 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No.104 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 329(4), 109(1), 76, 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. 3. On the fateful day, allegedly all the accused persons, including the petitioner barged into the house of the informant with intention to commit robbery and kill the informant. The petitioner is said to have tried to cut the neck of the informant’s husband by means of Fasuli. There is further allegation that co-accused Ranjeet Das assaulted the husband of the informant by means of Garasa due to which he sustained serious injury. There is allegation against other co-accused persons of causing assault and misbehaving with the informant. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66491 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner taking this Court through the narrations made in the FIR has submitted that besides the fact the alleged occurrence took place on 09.06.2025, the FIR came to be instituted on 12.06.2025 without there being any explanation of delay and, as such, false implication of the petitioner cannot be ruled out. It is further contended that, in fact, the informant and/or her husband have not sustained any grievous injury and, as such, the learned court below did not bother to discuss the nature of injury. The petitioner bears fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the investigation and the proceeding of the Court. 5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner of trying to cut the neck of the informant’s husband. 6. Having considered the submissions set forth by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the delay in lodging of the FIR, besides there is no discussion with regard to the alleged injury by the court below, coupled with the fair antecedent of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66491 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Samastipur in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No.104 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. rohit/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T