Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76429 (BOM)

SATISH CHIDRAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

ALP/271/2022 · 2025-10-17

Shri Sandeep V Marne

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neeta Sawant 926-ALP-271,272,273-2022.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL (PVT.) NO. 271 OF 2022 WITH APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT.) NO. 272 OF 2022 WITH APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT.) NO. 273 OF 2022 Satish Chidrawar …..Applicant : Versus : The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents Mr. Deep Shah, (through V.C) i/b. Mr. Harshawardhan G. Khambete, for the Applicant. Ms. Rashmi Tendulkar, APP for State. Mr. S.R. Pathak, for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED : 17 OCTOBER 2025. P.C : 1) Mr. Shah, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant/Appellant, on instructions, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Applications and the Appeals with liberty to file Appeal under the Proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973/Section 413 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NO. 1 of 2 FRIDAY, 17 OCTOBER 2025 Neeta Sawant 926-ALP-271,272,273-2022.docx Sanhita, 2023 before the Sessions Court in view of judgment of the Apex Court in Celestium Financial Versus. A. Gnanasekaran Etc.1. 2) Reserving the liberty as prayed for, the Applications and Appeals are permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of. 3) If Appeal is filed before the Sessions Court within a period of eight weeks, the Appellant/Applicant shall be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] 1 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320 _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NO. 2 of 2 FRIDAY, 17 OCTOBER 2025 NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2025.10.18 15:07:11 +0530