2025:UHC:5572-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 222 OF 2025 20th June, 2025 Bhavdeep Ravtey …… Petitioner Versus High Court of Uttarakhand and and Others …… Respondents Presence:- Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri G. Narendar) Learned counsel for the petitioner prays leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to prefer an administrative appeal, as provided under Chapter III, Rule 4(A) of the High Court Rules. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the High Court submits that the alternate remedy of appeal has not been exhausted and in that view, the writ petition is also pre-mature. 3. The submission is placed on record. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, as withdrawn, with liberty to exercise the alternate remedy of appeal, as noted supra. ________________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. ____________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 20th June, 2025 Ujjwal 1