2025:JHHC:15381 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1982 of 2025 ----- Jaglal Bhuiyan @ Bhulan Bhuiyan, son of Late Badhan Bhuiyan, resident of village-Jaber, Post Office and Police Station: Itkhori, District-Chatra. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, Advocate ----- Order No.05 Date: 13.06.2025 1. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested for misuse of privilege of regular bail in connection with S.T. Case No.68 of 2019 arising out of Itkhori P.S. Case No.229 of 2007 registered for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner earlier moved a regular bail application being B.A. No.708 of 2020 in connection with the present case which was allowed by this Court vide order dated 28th February, 2020 with the condition that the petitioner would co-operate in the trial and would appear before the trial court on each and every date fixed in the trial till conclusion of the same unless his physical presence was exempted by specific order of the trial court for a particular date, failing which the said court was at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. 3. It is further submitted that initially the petitioner used to regularly appear before the trial court on each and every date fixed, however, subsequently he went to Mumbai for earning 2025:JHHC:15381 2 his livelihood and due to the said reason he could not physically appear before the trial court on certain dates as a result of which his bail bond was cancelled vide order dated 23rd January, 2024. As soon as the petitioner came to know about the said fact, he surrendered before the trial court on 17th February, 2025 and since then he is in judicial custody. The petitioner undertakes that he will not misuse the privilege of regular bail in future. Hence, he may be granted the privilege of regular. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the petitioner’s prayer for bail. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the materials available on record, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Chatra in connection with S.T. Case No.68 of 2019 arising out of Itkhori P.S. Case No.229 of 2007, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall appear before the trial court on each and every date fixed in the trial till conclusion of the same unless his physical presence is exempted by specific order of the trial court for a particular date, failing which the said court is at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Rohit/