Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76382 (ALL)

SHIV PRATAP KESHARI v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/5768/2025 · 2025-07-24

Gautam Chowdhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:122538 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 5768 of 2025 Applicant :- Shiv Pratap Keshari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vindeshwari Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pavanesh Kumar Yadav Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. This is the second criminal misc. anticipatory bail application moved on behalf of the applicant. The First Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 4035 of 2025 (Shiv Pratap Keshari Vs. State of U.P. and another) has been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 22.05.2025. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Jai Kishan Chaurais, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The present anticipatory bail application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 0278 of 2023, under Sections 452, 304, 506, 504 I.P.C., Police Station Phoolpur, District Prayagraj with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail till conclusion of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant an apprehension that he may be arrested in the above-mentioned case, inspite of the fact that there is no credible evidence against him. Learned counsel further argued that the applicant undertakes to co- operate during investigation and trial and he would appear as and when required by the Court. It has been stated that in case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application for anticipatory bail. 6. Perusal of the record shows that the first criminal misc. anticipatory bail application moved on behalf of the applicant has been rejected by this Court on merits and no fresh ground has been pointed out by learned counsel for the applicant in the instant second anticipatory bail application. 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected. Order Date :- 25.7.2025 S.Ali Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad