- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31764 WP No. 24776 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 24776 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR NIROOP DD J S/O MR. D.A. JAYARAME GOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS DODDAMAGARAVALLI VILLAGE POST HANGARAVALLI CHIKAMAGALURU-577111 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. SHASHIKANTH PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION BANK OF INDIA CHIKMAGALURU BRANCH SRINIVAS ARCADE MG ROAD CHIKAMAGALURU-577101 REPRESENTED BY IT BRANCH MANAGER Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31764 WP No. 24776 of 2025 2. MR. GOWTHAM D.T. S/O MR. D.A. THAMMANNA GOWDA DODDAMAGARAVALI VILLAGE POST: HANGARAVALLI CHIKAMAGALURU-577111 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE NOTICE DTD 28.07.25 IN REF NO. 168709/1/25-26 ISSUED THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, M.G ROAD, CHIKMAGALURU (ANNX-D). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31764 WP No. 24776 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved by the first respondent's notice to repay a sum in excess of Rs.12,00,000/- within seven days lest the vehicle be seized. Mr. K. Shashikanth Prasad, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the first respondent's action in issuing the notice is arbitrary because the claim for dues is exaggerated. This Court is of the view that if the petitioner has any grievance as regards the above, he must necessarily work out his remedies as is permissible in law and there is no reason for exercising this Court's jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, subject to all just exceptions, the petition stand disposed of. RB Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE