901.1993.17.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1993 OF 2017 Beach Queen Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Anr. .. Respondents … Ms. Trisha Choudhari a/w. Mr. Ranveer Choudhari, Advocates for the Petitioner Ms. Oorja Dhond i/b. Komal R. Punjabi, Advocate for Respondent No.1 ... CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. DATE : 19th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C. : On a praecipe received in the office on 17th November 2025 this writ petition has come on board. 2. Ms. Trisha Choudhari, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. In this writ petition the following prayers have been made: “a) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing that Respondent No. 1 to restore Flat No. B/103 in the Petitioner Society as per the originally approved plan annexed at Exhibit “Z” to this Petition; b) that pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Petition, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to appoint an officer of Respondent No. 1 and/or an officer of this Hon’ble Court with a direction to visit the Flat No. B/103 in the Petitioner Society along with the structural engineer of the Petitioner Society for purpose of inspection of the said flat; bgp Page | 1 BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL Digitally signed by BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL Date: 2025.11.27 11:14:51 +0530 901.1993.17.docx c) that pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Petition, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to appoint an officer of Respondent No. 1 and/or an Officer of this Hon’ble Court with a direction to ensure that the engineers/contracts of the Petitioner Society are allowed carry out repairs and renovations in Flat No. B/103 in the Petitioner Society, for safeguarding the condition of the building of the Petitioner society under the supervision of this Hon’ble Court; d) for ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c) above ; e) for costs; f) for such other and further reliefs, as the nature and circumstances of the case may require.” 3. In view of the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner, Writ Petition No.1993 of 2017 is dismissed as withdrawn. [GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] bgp Page | 2