Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76359 (ALL)

KAMLESH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/10338/2025 · 2025-07-24

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:125728 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10338 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kamlesh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Mani Pandey,Tushar Krishnani Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "i) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner given on affidavit dated 29.03.2025 (Annexure no. 2 to this writ petition) with a speaking order within stipulated period of time, during the pendency of the present writ petition before this Hon'ble Court, otherwise the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss." It appears from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent no. 2. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent no. 2 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation and decide the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to add the order to be passed by the competent authority, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. Order Date :- 25.7.2025 IrfanUddin Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad