IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 146 Darshana Gupta U T Chandigarh and Others CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Objection Certificate’. 2. permission from the aforesaid respondent for execution of Sub Conveyance Deed her by respond on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondent to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3 has no objection. 3. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Darshana Gupta Versus U T Chandigarh and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Lakendra Singh, Advocate for Ms. Samridhi Sareen, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jaivir Chandail, Advocate and Mr. Tanvir Singh Attariwala, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3-U.T. Chandigarh. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made is for directing re Objection Certificate’. Learned counsel submits that permission from the aforesaid respondent for execution of Sub Conveyance Deed in respect of Flat No.1225, Category “A” by respondent No.4, regarding which no decision has been taken. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondent the same in a time bound manner, to which learned counsel for ents No.1 to 3 has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18965-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 10.07.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Lakendra Singh, Advocate for Advocate, Mr. Jaivir Chandail, Advocate and Mr. Tanvir Singh Attariwala, Advocate, U.T. Chandigarh. Prayer made is for directing respondent No.3 to issue ‘No Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has sought permission from the aforesaid respondent for execution of Sub- 1225, Category “A” allotted to no decision has been taken. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondent No.3 the same in a time bound manner, to which learned counsel for ew of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.11 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-18965-2025 -2- respondent No.3 to decide the claim of the petitioner, within a period of 2 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to her and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 10.07.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.11 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.