IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1310 of 2025 ====================================================== Nita Singh W/o- Praveen Kumar Singh, D/o Raj Deo Singh Resident of Village- Ghabhirar, Police Station- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan, at present resident of Mohalla- Masumganj, New Colony, South of Patrol Pump, Police Station- Bhagwan Bazar, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus Praveen Kumar Singh Son of Sri Raj Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Ghabhirar, Police Station- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh duly assisted by Mr. Sarvagya Nand Sharma for the opposite party. 2. The present petition has been preferred: “for the transfer of Matrimonial Case No.302/24 registered Under Section 13(1) (i k) of the Hindu Marriage Act (Praveen Kumar Singh Vs. Nita Singh) the Learned Court of Principal Judge, Family Court Siwan from the Judgeship of Siwan to Judgeship of Saran at Chapra.” 3. Paragraph 13 and 14 incorporates the ordeal of the lady and read as under: “13. That petitioner has no source of her personal income. She is residing in her paternal house. She has to take care of her daughter and Patna High Court MJC No.1310 of 2025(2) dt.19-08-2026 2/3 make provision for her education and many other things. In such a situation it become very difficult to go alongwith her daughter and persue the case vide Matrimonial Case No.302/24 before the Learned Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Siwan. 14. That the petitioner has got no place of residence at Siwan and she would be put to great inconvenience and hardship if she has to attend the court at Siwan which is bit far away from Saran.” 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party submits that he has apprehension in going to the place of transfer and it will suffice if he is allowed to join the proceeding through video conferencing besides physical appearance, if required. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to it. 6. In that background, with the consent of the parties, the Matrimonial Case No. 302 of 2024 is transferred from learned Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Siwan to Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned APP, duly assisted by Mr. Patna High Court MJC No.1310 of 2025(2) dt.19-08-2026 3/3 Sarvagya Nand Sharma for the opposite party. 7. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Saran at Chapra considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation. 8. MJC No. 1310 of 2025 stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Judgeship of Saran at Chapra with liberty to the parties to appear physically or through video conferencing. 9. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Saran at Chapra considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation. 10. MJC No. 1310 of 2025 stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation. sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U