UDHAM SINGH v. UMA SHANKAR GUPTA, DIRECTOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATS , PUNJAB
COCP/3206/2025 · 2025-09-16
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76336 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76336 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-3206
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
107
Udham Singh
Uma Shankar Gupta, Director Rural
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: -
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
1.
dated 29.05.2025 ‘Udham Singh was disposed of State to the effect learned Director Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab (respondent No. 2 herein) an a period of four weeks from today’.
2.
decision has been taken thereupon.
3.
of affidavit of Sh. 06-2025
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP Date of Decision: 1
Udham Singh
Versus
Uma Shankar Gupta, Director Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Arun Takhi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab
Assisted by Sh. Manjeet Singh, Senior Assistant
O/o Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 29.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed in C Udham Singh vs. State of Punjab and others was disposed of on the statement of learned counsel for the respondent to the effect that ‘the matter is pending consideration before the learned Director Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab (respondent No. 2 herein) and final decision shall be taken thereon within a period of four weeks from today’.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date no decision has been taken thereupon.
Compliance report dated 09.09.2025 of affidavit of Sh. Uma Shankar Gupta, Director, Department of Rural
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3206-2025 Date of Decision: 16.09.2025
… Petitioner Development and Panchayats, Punjab
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Arun Takhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab Assisted by Sh. Manjeet Singh, Senior Assistant Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab. The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 1) passed in CWP-16449-2025 titled as and others’, whereby the writ petition on the statement of learned counsel for the respondent- ‘the matter is pending consideration before the learned Director Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab d final decision shall be taken thereon within
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date no .09.2025, filed in Court by way Uma Shankar Gupta, Director, Department of Rural
The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order titled as whereby the writ petition ‘the matter is pending consideration before the learned Director Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab d final decision shall be taken thereon within
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date no , filed in Court by way Uma Shankar Gupta, Director, Department of Rural RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.18 09:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
COCP-3206
Development and Panchayats, Punjab, has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.
4.
compliance of the order dated dated 13.08.2025 therefore, nothing survives in the present petition.
5.
above, the order dated with and nothing survives in the present petition; and the same may be
disposed of speaking order d law, if so advised.
6.
7.
required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby liberty to the petitioner, as
8.
9.
16.09.2025 rishu
06-2025
-2- Development and Panchayats, Punjab, is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respon compliance of the order dated 29.05.2025 (Annexure P 13.08.2025 (Annexure R-1/T) has been duly passed in the matter, nothing survives in the present petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner above, the order dated 29.05.2025 (Annexure P with and nothing survives in the present petition; and the same may be
disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid speaking order dated 13.08.2025 (Annexure R law, if so advised.
Heard.
In view of the facts noted above, no further direct required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby liberty to the petitioner, as aforesaid.
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. earned counsel for the respondent submits that in .05.2025 (Annexure P-1), speaking order ) has been duly passed in the matter, nothing survives in the present petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the (Annexure P-1) stands duly complied with and nothing survives in the present petition; and the same may be , with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid 13.08.2025 (Annexure R-1/T), in accordance with In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby disposed of, with Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Yes/No is taken on record. A copy thereof, that in
) has been duly passed in the matter,
1) stands duly complied with and nothing survives in the present petition; and the same may be , with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid 1/T), in accordance with is with RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.18 09:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.