Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76314 (PNJ)

SARLA DEVI AND ORS v. RAMNATH AND ORS

FAO/5981/2014 · 2025-02-06

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 229-II Smt. Sarla Ramnath CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU the Award Claims Tri claimants/ Rs.5,87,000 Dharmende enhanceme times the m reports from process fee the position FAO-5981-2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR FAO No.5981 of Date of decision Sarla Devi and others Versus nath and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Sanwar Ali, Advocate for Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate None for respondent No.6. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellants have filed the ward dated 19.3.2014 passed by th s Tribunal, Narnaul whereby the c ants/appellants has been partly allo ,87,000/- has been awarded to them mender in the road side acciden ncement of the same. The matter pertains to the yea s the matter has been listed before the rts from 06.1.2016 onwards depict tha ess fee, notices could not be issued to osition till date. Today again, learned 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH of 2014 (O & M) cision :-06.02.2025 …..Appellants …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ate for ocate for the appellants. ed the present appeal impugning by the learned Motor Accident the claim petition filed by the y allowed and compensation of them on account of death of ccident and further prays for he year 2014 and as many as 13 ore the Court. As per the office ict that because of non filing of ued to the respondents. Same is learned proxy counsel appearing VIJAY ASIJA 2025.02.10 15.36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document for the app office repo appellants their pursu valuable opportuniti hand, the approach. counsel are this Court non-prosec February 0 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo FAO-5981-2014 he appellants prays for time to do th e report(s). A bare reading of the abo s have exhibited an utterly casu pursuit of the present litigation. It is public time of the Court has be rtunities to the appellants in the intere , the appellants have adopted an u oach. It is clear that neither the app sel are seriously interested in pursuing Court is left with no other option exce prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, uary 06, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 do the needful to comply the e above facts shows that the y casual and derelict attitude in . It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording interest of justice. On the other an utterly casual and careless e applicants-appellants nor their ursuing the present matter. Thus, n except to dismiss the same for if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.02.10 15.36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document