1 2252.2000CA+corrected.odt (This order is corrected as per the order of speaking to the minutes dated 09.12.2025) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 986 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2252 OF 2024 IN RAST/2730/2024 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS VERSUS ANAND HARIDAS NAVGIRE AND ANR ... AGP for Applicants : Mr. V.K. Kotecha Advocate for petitioner : Mr. A.D. Pawar ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2243 OF 2024 IN RAST/1281/2024 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ANOTHER VERSUS SANJAY RAMNATH INGLE AND ANOTHER ... AGP for applicants/State : Mr. V.K. Kotecha Advocate for respondent No.1 : Mr. Ketan D. Pote h/f Mr. Arvind G. Ambetkar WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2253 OF 2024 IN RAST/1284/2024 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS VERSUS PUNJAHARI BABURAO DIGHE AND OTHERS ... AGP for applicants/State : Mr. V.K. Kotecha Advocate for Respondent nos.8, 9, 10 to 14 : Mr. T.P. Shirsath Advocate for respondent nos.6 to 10 in WP : Mr. S.S. Wagh ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 17th OCTOBER, 2025. 2025:BHC-AUG:37888-DB 2 2252.2000CA+corrected.odt ORDER : . The applications are filed by the State for condonation of delay of 597, 584 and 584 days in filing review applications, seeking review of the order passed in Writ Petition No.11513/2018 and other connected Writ Petitions. 2. Heard learned A.G.P. for the applicant/State and learned advocates for respective respondents. 3. Admittedly, these delay condonation applications and review applications are covered by the order dated 07.02.2025 in Civil Application No.1538/2025 in Review Application (Stamp) No.26353/2024 and connected matters, order dated 27.02.2025 in Civil Application No.11390/2024 in Review Application (Stamp) No.26108/2024 and connected matters, order dated 28.07.2025 in Civil Application No.4286/2024 in Review Application (Stamp) No.9879/2024 and order dated 13.08.2025 in Civil Application No.8205/2024 in Review Application (Stamp) No.9881/2024 which are passed in similar circumstances, whereby this Court has dismissed the prayers made by the applicants in delay condonation applications as well as in review applications. 4. For the reasons stated in the abovementioned orders, civil applications are dismissed. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI,J.) sga